Your Instagram post
Paste your Instagram post. Nothing to upload.
Make a competitive analysis
Consumer brands show their pricing, their packaging and their claims here before anywhere else.
Free to try, no card. Your Instagram post opens in Ancher.
Paste your Instagram post. Nothing to upload.
Every one of these stays separately addressable instead of collapsing into one block of text.
A side-by-side read on rivals: positioning, features, pricing, and the space nobody occupies.
A brand's Instagram is its positioning with the marketing department's edits still visible: the claim on slide one, the ingredient panel on slide six, the price on slide nine. Ancher collects every product named, separates creator accounts from brand accounts, fills a matrix cell only from a first-hand account of using something, and dates every price it reads off a slide.
The honest version
Sponsorship disclosure is inconsistent and the production is identical either way, so the usual quality signals fail completely. What still works is whether the person describes using the thing over time — the second week, the thing that annoyed them — because a paid unboxing almost never does. The matrix is built from that distinction rather than from a disclosure tag.
One post, at slide 6/8, read two ways.Illustrative. The figure is invented; the gap it falls into is not.
Month three update on all four of these. Only one of them still
On slide 6 of the carousel — not readThe specific never reaches the draft
Lands in the draft, with its timecode
What comes out
A side-by-side read on rivals: positioning, features, pricing, and the space nobody occupies.
Every product named, split into ones an account used over time and ones only shown.
How each product is described by users, kept apart from how its own brand account describes it.
Feature by product, filled only from sustained-use accounts and left empty otherwise.
Prices seen on slides or burned into video, each with the post's date.
Complaints recurring across unrelated creators that no named product answers.
The link on its own gets a summary. This is the instruction that produces the 5 sections above, in that order, with the rules that keep them honest. Paste it with your Instagram posts — in Ancher, or in whatever assistant you already use.
Build a competitive analysis from these posts. (1) List every product named, split into used-over-time and shown. (2) Describe positioning in users' words, kept separate from brand accounts. (3) Fill a matrix cell only from an account of sustained use — never from an unboxing or a brand post. (4) Record prices from slides and burned-in text with post dates. (5) List unanswered gaps. Mark each account creator or brand, and treat enthusiastic first impressions as advertising.
The detail, if you want it
| From the Instagram post | Into | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Every slide in a carousel | Feature matrix | Comparison carousels put one product per slide, which is the closest thing this platform offers to a structured evaluation. |
| Frames from the video | Pricing | Prices are typed onto the video rather than spoken or captioned, so only frame sampling reaches them. |
| Caption | Positioning | The caption is where a claim is stated in words, which is what a positioning row needs even though it was written for reach. |
| Likes and comment counts | Whitespace | A complaint that drew far more response than the surrounding posts is a shared gap rather than one person's experience. |
| Reel audio, transcribed | Players | On a reel the list of what was actually tried is spoken, and it is usually longer than the list shown on screen. |
The caption is where the actual claim lives; the visual is usually the hook.
Carousels are decks in disguise — slide seven is often the one with the substance.
Spoken-over reels carry detail that appears nowhere in the caption.
Text burned into a reel is invisible to a caption scrape but survives frame sampling.
Reach tells you which format the audience actually responded to.
By ignoring disclosure as a signal and looking at whether the account describes sustained use. A paid post shows the unboxing and the first impression; it very rarely comes back in month three, and that asymmetry is more reliable than any tag.
For positioning and pricing, yes — that is the brand telling you exactly how it wants to be understood. For the matrix, no. A brand's own post is never evidence that a feature works.
Because nobody described using that feature over time. An empty cell says the category talks about something nobody actually tested, which is itself worth knowing before you build a positioning around it.
Everything you save lives in one workspace, so the competitive analysis is built from your sources — not from a model's memory of the internet.
Open Ancher →Not an Instagram post? The same competitive analysis also comes from YouTube video, X thread, LinkedIn post.