Your recording
Paste your recording. Nothing to upload.
Make a financial analysis
A number spoken on a call and a number shown on the slide are not always the same number.
Free to try, no card. Your recording opens in Ancher.
Paste your recording. Nothing to upload.
Every one of these stays separately addressable instead of collapsing into one block of text.
Figures checked against the sentence or table that supports them.
Financial figures said out loud are rounded, hedged and sometimes restated three minutes later. An analysis built from audio alone inherits every one of those distortions silently. Ancher keeps each figure attached to the second it was spoken, keeps the frame if it was also displayed, and flags where the spoken version and the on-screen version disagree instead of quietly picking one.
The honest version
On any call with slides, someone says roughly a third while the chart behind them reads 31.4%. Neither is wrong, but only one belongs in an analysis, and a transcript-only tool never sees the second. Ancher holds both, marks the divergence, and leaves the judgement to you rather than resolving it out of sight.
One second of one recording, at 08:14, read two ways.Illustrative. The figure is invented; the gap it falls into is not.
gross margin was roughly , call it flat year on year
Slide displayed at the time — not readThe specific never reaches the draft
Lands in the draft, with its timecode
What comes out
Figures checked against the sentence or table that supports them.
What the numbers amount to, in one paragraph, before any table.
Each figure with the sentence it came from and the second it was said.
Direction over the periods discussed, with what was and was not comparable.
Caveats as stated, including anything the speaker declined to answer.
Which recording, what date, and where a figure was spoken versus shown.
The link on its own gets a summary. This is the instruction that produces the 5 sections above, in that order, with the rules that keep them honest. Paste it with your recording — in Ancher, or in whatever assistant you already use.
Analyse the figures in this recording. Open with what they amount to in one paragraph. List every figure with the sentence it came from and its timestamp, and mark whether it was spoken, displayed, or both. Where the spoken and displayed versions differ, keep both. Preserve hedges exactly as stated, note anything the speaker declined to answer, and identify what was not comparable across periods.
The detail, if you want it
| From the recording | Into | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Transcript with timings | Evidence per figure | A figure without the sentence around it loses its basis, and the timing is what keeps the sentence recoverable. |
| Screen shares, if it is video | Evidence per figure | Displayed figures are the precise ones; spoken figures are the rounded ones, and an analysis needs to know which it is holding. |
| Unresolved threads | Risks | A question asked on a call and not answered is itself a finding, and it never appears in a summary. |
| Commitment language | Trend | Guidance is commitment language — we expect, we will be at — and it is what separates a forecast from a comment. |
| Duration and timeline | Headline figures | The line item that took the most airtime is usually the one under pressure, which is a reasonable place to start the headline. |
Every segment carries start and end seconds, which is what turns a claim into a record.
I'll take that, by Friday, let's park it — these phrases are what separate a task list from a topic list.
What a conversation failed to close is usually the reason for the next one.
A shared screen is sampled as frames, so the number that drove a decision stays attached to it.
Where the time actually went is a finding in itself for any recurring meeting.
Both versions are kept with their timestamps and the later restatement is marked as such. Speakers correct themselves constantly on live calls, and an analysis that silently keeps the first figure is wrong in a way nobody can see.
If the recording is video, frames are sampled, so a figure that was displayed but never read aloud is available. On audio-only recordings you get only what was spoken, and the analysis says so.
No. Treat it as a fast structured read of what was said, with every claim traceable to a second of audio, and verify anything material against the filings before it informs a decision.
Everything you save lives in one workspace, so the financial analysis is built from your sources — not from a model's memory of the internet.
Open Ancher →Not a recording? The same financial analysis also comes from YouTube video, X thread, PDF.