Your PDF
Paste your PDF. Nothing to upload.
Make a market research report
Upload the reports. Figures pulled from the tables, each dated, with the vendor-funded ones flagged.
Free to try, no card. Your PDF opens in Ancher.
Paste your PDF. Nothing to upload.
Every one of these stays separately addressable instead of collapsing into one block of text.
A structured read on a market: who is in it, what buyers say, how it is priced, where the gaps are.
Industry reports are the best available source for market figures and the worst for neutrality, since most are commissioned by someone with a position. Ancher pulls numbers from the tables with their dates and definitions attached, and keeps who published each one visible next to every figure it produced.
The honest version
Two reports sizing the same market differ by a factor of three because they defined it differently, and the definition is in a methodology footnote nobody reads. A tool that extracts the headline figure and drops the footnote produces a confident number that falls apart under the first question.
One page of one PDF, at p.7, read two ways.Illustrative. The figure is invented; the gap it falls into is not.
Report A sizes the market at $4.2B. Report B, same year, same name, says
Methodology note, page 7 — not readThe specific never reaches the draft
Lands in the draft, with its timecode
What comes out
A structured read on a market: who is in it, what buyers say, how it is priced, where the gaps are.
How each report defines the market, quoted from its methodology, because that is where the disagreements actually live.
Demand figures with the date, the definition and the publisher attached to each.
Companies named across reports, with a note on which report was commissioned by whom.
Pricing from tables, dated, with undated figures excluded rather than carried forward.
Segments the reports name but do not size, which is where a gap is most often hiding.
The link on its own gets a summary. This is the instruction that produces the 5 sections above, in that order, with the rules that keep them honest. Paste it with your PDF — in Ancher, or in whatever assistant you already use.
From these industry PDFs, build a market research report. (1) Quote how each report defines the market, from its methodology, with page. (2) Give demand figures from table cells, each with its date, definition and publisher. (3) Name companies discussed, noting which report was commissioned by whom where stated. (4) Take pricing from tables with dates; discard undated figures. (5) Where reports disagree, show both figures with their definitions rather than choosing. (6) Flag segments named but never sized.
The detail, if you want it
| From the PDF | Into | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Tables as tables | Demand signals | Sizing figures live in tables with their footnote markers intact, which is what keeps the definition attached to the number. |
| Page numbers | Market definition | A methodology note is only useful if it can be found again, and a page anchor is what makes that possible. |
| Embedded images and figures | Pricing | Pricing comparisons are almost always charts, and a chart's axis labels carry the units the prose omits. |
| Document structure in order | Players | The heading tree exposes which vendors got their own section, which is a blunt but real signal about who commissioned the report. |
| Document structure in order | Opportunities | Where several reports lean on the same underlying dataset — visible in their reference sections — an apparent consensus is one source counted three times. |
Headings, body and captions arrive as separate elements, so the document's own outline survives ingest.
A page-level anchor is what makes a citation checkable by someone else holding the same file.
Tables come back as their own elements rather than as flattened lines, so a figure stays attached to the row and column that give it meaning.
Figure captions frequently carry the tightest statement of a finding in the whole document.
Elements come back in sequence, which is what lets a section be reassembled rather than guessed at.
The same path takes .docx and .pptx, so a deck and its write-up can sit in one collection.
Trust the direction more than the magnitude. Definitions vary enough that the absolute figures are rarely comparable, but a consistent trend across several independently-defined reports is a reasonable signal to act on.
The sponsor is usually named in the front matter or the acknowledgements, and the heading structure often gives it away — a vendor with its own chapter in an ostensibly neutral survey is a tell. Ancher keeps the publisher next to each figure so the pattern is visible.
That is the stronger version. Pair the reports with review-site and forum sources so a claim about adoption can be checked against whether anyone is talking about the product at all.
Everything you save lives in one workspace, so the market research report is built from your sources — not from a model's memory of the internet.
Open Ancher →Not a PDF? The same market research report also comes from YouTube video, X thread, LinkedIn post.