Your web page
Paste your web page. Nothing to upload.
Make a blog post
Reading three articles and writing a fourth is the job. Rewriting one of them is not.
Free to try, no card. Your web page opens in Ancher.
Paste your web page. Nothing to upload.
Every one of these stays separately addressable instead of collapsing into one block of text.
A publishable article with its own argument, not a transcript rearranged into paragraphs.
A post built from a single source is that source with different adjectives, and readers can tell. Ancher pulls the readable body from every URL you paste, keeps each one's author and publication date, and follows what they link to — so the draft can be built on where the sources disagree, which is the only place a new post has anything to add.
The honest version
Outbound links are the part of an article that a text extractor throws away and a careful reader uses first. They show which sources a writer trusts, which claims they were unwilling to make in their own voice, and where several articles are quietly leaning on the same one. Ancher keeps them, so a draft can cite the origin instead of the third retelling.
One screen of one page, at fig. 2, read two ways.Illustrative. The figure is invented; the gap it falls into is not.
Adoption has grown sharply across the sector, according to recent industry figures
Chart in the article body — not readThe specific never reaches the draft
Lands in the draft, with its timecode
What comes out
A publishable article with its own argument, not a transcript rearranged into paragraphs.
Your argument, which has to be something none of the sources already said.
An opening built on the tension between sources rather than on a definition.
Sections organised by question, with each source appearing where it is relevant.
Figures with the page they came from and the date that page was published.
Every URL, its author and its date, with what each contributed.
The link on its own gets a summary. This is the instruction that produces the 5 sections above, in that order, with the rules that keep them honest. Paste it with your web page — in Ancher, or in whatever assistant you already use.
Write a blog post from these URLs. First identify where the sources disagree and build the angle from that rather than from what they all say. Open on the tension. Organise the body by question, not by source. Attach the URL, author and publication date to every figure you use, note where several sources are citing the same original, and list all sources at the end with what each contributed.
The detail, if you want it
| From the web page | Into | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Many pages in one collection | The angle | An angle needs at least three pages, because a position is only interesting once you can see what it is a position against. |
| Outbound links | Sources and credit | Following what an article links to is how you find out whether four write-ups are four sources or one source repeated. |
| Title, author, published date | Specifics and numbers | A publication date is what stops a figure from 2019 being presented as the current state of anything. |
| Inline images | Specifics and numbers | The chart in an article usually carries the sample size and caveats the paragraph around it leaves out. |
| Readable content, decluttered | Body sections | Navigation, promo boxes and cookie banners are dropped, so the draft is built from the article rather than from the page. |
Navigation, ads and cookie banners are dropped, so the collection holds the article rather than the page.
A date is what stops a three-year-old post from being read as current.
What a writer links to repeatedly reveals the sources they actually trust.
Charts and diagrams in an article are usually the evidence the prose is describing.
A single page is an anecdote; the value of this route appears once several are compared.
Three to six for a post with an argument. One gives you a summary with better formatting; several let you build on the places where the sources contradict each other, which is where a new piece earns its existence.
Yes, and they are among the most useful things it keeps. They reveal whether apparently independent sources are all citing the same original, which changes how much weight a claim deserves.
They return very little, usually the headline and a teaser. If a source matters, read it yourself and paste in a page you can actually access, because a draft built on a teaser is built on nothing.
Everything you save lives in one workspace, so the blog post is built from your sources — not from a model's memory of the internet.
Open Ancher →Not a web page? The same blog post also comes from YouTube video, PDF, X thread.